![]() ![]() But other aspects critical to the bay could be severely im- pacted: As a re- sult, they won’t be affected by the floo d, acco rdi ng to Joh n Surrick, a spokesman for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. O n t h e posi tiveside, thegrass esin the ba y ha ve alr ea dy st opp ed growing and are dying back in preparation for winter. Thatsurge of floodwa ter and everyth ing carried with it pre- sents a wide ran ge of po- te nti al im - pact s to the bay ecos ys- t e m, a n d s o m e o f the m cou ld be devas tat- ing. Mos t of thesedim ent,debr is and chem ical s that flus hed through the Susquehanna Riv- er duringlast week ’sflood ends up in one place : the Chesa - peake Bay. “Thereis noquestion thattoday, weareso muchmorepre par edand awa reof wha t’ s goi ngon asa res ult of not only media technology, but otheradvancesmadeouttherethat Local newspapers would have been evacuated, therefore unable toreportor toprint a new spap er. T ele visi on stat ions woul d hav e tak enfootag e ofan are a onfilm,re- ported back to their stations and then broadcast at a regular news hou r – if tel evi sionwasevenacces- sible to residents affected by the flood. Fl as h ba ckto th e Ag ne s flo odof 1972, and the most-used source of communication would have been radio. ![]() It seemed that information was availab le every moment throug h television,radio,newspaperandin- ternetoutlets,withphotosf lashing acr ossscre ensfroma numb erof lo- cal communities and news alerts nearlyeveryhouronthelevelofthe river. Andusing newtechnology, local media outlets were right behind the m, get ting the wo rd out as quicklyand efficient ly as possibl e. Whe n the Susq ueh anna Rive r beg anto riseearl ierthismonth,of- ficialsbegan issuingevacuationor- ders. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |